Teresa V.

Our 11-year-old responded well to the personalized intervention — the short, regular sessions helped reinforce number sense and homework skills, though I'd prefer slightly longer lessons to cover more challenging material.

The course description—an intake to identify strengths and challenges and sessions that can use classwork or targeted activities—matched what we expected, and I appreciated the focus on adapting pace for learners with IEPs and dyscalculia. That said, after a month the 25-minute lessons twice a week weren't enough time to really work through fractions and problem-solving, and my child often seemed rushed. It might work as a supplement but wasn't sufficient as our primary support.

My 6-year-old had twice-weekly 25-minute lessons for several weeks. While the one-on-one format and focus on problem solving were useful, we found the pacing too slow and didn't see the steady progress we'd hoped for over the 15-week course.

We signed up for the twice-weekly, 25-minute sessions over four weeks and liked that the program targets core math skills, but for my 9-year-old with ADHD the lessons felt too short and we didn't see much progress.