Mr. R.

While the idea of using primary documents is good, the once-a-week, 60-minute format didn't give my teen enough time to develop an argument properly. It had potential but was too limited for our expectations.

Disappointed overall — the course felt far too short to meaningfully explore the early Cold War. Our teen was left wanting more depth after the four-week program.

A compact, thoughtful course that emphasizes evidence-based historical writing. The four-week schedule was easy to fit into our routine and my teen stayed engaged.

Engaging curriculum for older teens. My child liked analyzing documents from 1945–1961 and the weekly 60-minute lessons kept things focused without dragging on.